VILLAGE FUND POLICY: MEASURING THE PROGRESS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN FOUR REGENCY IN THE TOBA CALDERA THROUGH THE VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT INDICATOR (IPD) AND VILLAGE BUILDING INDEX (IDM)
Main Article Content
Amran Manurung
Erlina
Sirojuzilam
Suwardi Lubis
Economic development is a process of developing community capacity in the long term so that it requires proper and accurate planning in reducing economic inequality between cities and regencies. One of the indicators for measuring the success of economic development in 4 regencies, namely North Tapanuli, Toba, Humbang Hasundutan and Samosir, which are in the Toba Caldera Area as a center for the development of world Geopark tourism which has been designated by UNESCO as a world heritage from the geological aspect.The purpose of this research is to conduct a descriptive economic analysisof the progress of the economic aspects of the 4 districts in the Toba Caldera region through the 2018 Village Development Index (IPD), namely to become Disadvantaged - Developing - Independent districts. While the Developing Village Index (IDM) will explain 5 categories ofRegency achievements for the status of villages classified as Very Disadvantaged - Underdeveloped - Developing – Advanced - Independent to prove the implementation of the Village Fund policy.The results of the study show that the 4 districts resulting from the division of regional autonomy policies and Fiscal Decentralization in Indonesia plus the Village Fund, it turns out that in 2020-2021 there are no districts that are included in the category of Independent and Advanced IDM Status. However, there are 2 districts that are in the Developing category, namely Samosir Regency with an IDM achievement of 0.6275 which is ranked 301st nationally and 12th at the provincial level in North Sumatra for City Regency. Furthermore, Toba Regency with an IDM of 0.6268 ranks 314th nationally and14th province. Finally, Humbang Hasundutan Regency has an IDM of 0.60502 in the 347th and 15th ranks. While the parent district, before the era of Regional Autonomy, namely NorthTapanuli Regency, was only included in the IDM status category, it was still lagging behind with an achievement of only 0.5904 being ranked 358th nationally and 8th in the province.In the IPD category, North Sumatra Province only reached 56.82, below the Sumatra Island average of 60.02, and the national average IPD reached 59.36. Furthermore, for these 4 regencies below the national average, the Sumatra Island region and the Provinces namely North Tapanuli 55.04, Toba 56.20, Humbang Hasundutan 56.08 and Samosir 54.84. So there is still much to be achieved by the Government of the 4 Regencies in order to improve people's lives optimally, prosperously, fairly and evenly, where the central government has stimulated the Village Fund policy which increased in value in the last 5 years before the Covid- 19 pandemic.
Achmad Amiruddin. (2018). Pemberdayaan Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) Binaan Dinas Perdagangan Kota Surabaya Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Abdul Halim. (2004). Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat. Antlöv,H.,Wetterberg.,L.Dharmawan.
(2016).“VillageGovernance,CommunityLife,andthe2014VillageLaw in Indonesia.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 52 (2):1-42.
Bakri, Syafrizal, Hasdi Aimo. (2015). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antar Kabupaten/Kota Di Sumatera Barat Dan Kebijakan Penanggulannya, Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Vol. 4, No. 7
Basri, Yuswar Zainul & Mulyadi Subri. (2005). Keuangan Negara dan Analisis Kebijakan Utang Luar Negeri. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bappenas and Statistics Indonesia. 2015. “Village Development Index of 2014 – Challenges in Meeting the Village Minimum Service Standard.” Bappenas and Statistics Indonesia.
Breman, J. 2001. “The Impact of the Asian Economic Crisis on Work and Welfare in Village Java.” Journal of Agrarian Change 1 (2): 242–282.
Darise, Nurlan. (2009). Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: PT. Indeks. Prastiwi,DP&dkk;(2019) “Indeks Pembangunan Desa Tahun Anggaran 2018. Jakarta- Subdirektorat Statistik Ketahanan Wilayah.
Faridi, Muhammad Zahir. (2011). Contribution of Fiscal Decentralization to.
Economic Growth. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hanly Fendy Djohar. (2015). Strategi Pertumbuhan Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado.
Kemen PUPR. (2019). Pejelasan Profil Kabupaten Kawasan Kaldera. Diakses melalui: https://Sippa.Ciptakarya.Pu.Go.Id/
Kemendes RI. (2015). Indeks Desa Membangun (IDM). Kementrian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi. https://idm.kemendesa.go.id/
Kemenkeu RI. (2017). Buku Pintar Dana Desa Dengan Tema “Dana Desa Untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat: Menciptakan Lapangan Kerja, Mengatasi Kesenjangan, Dan Mengentaskan Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Kementerian
Kuncoro, Mudrajad. (2004). Otonomi Daerah dan Pembangunan Daerah: Reformasi, Perencanaan, Strategi, dan Peluang. Jakarta:
Penerbit Gramedia.
---------------------. (2013). Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Karya et al. (2016). Makroekonomi Pengantar Untuk Manajemen”. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Kunarjo. (2002). Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Program Pembangunan.
Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia UI Press.
Lalira,D.,A.T.Nakoko,andI.P.F.Rorong.2018.“ImpactsofVillageFundAnd AllocationofVillageFundonthe PovertyLevelinGemehSub-district TalaudIslandsRegency.”EfficiencyScientificPeriodicJournal18(4).
Mangkoesoebroto, Guritno (2002). Ekonomi Publik. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Mardiasmo. (2002). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
---------------. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.
Mohamad Sukarno. (2020). Analisis Pengembangan Potensi Desa Berbasis Indeks Membangun Desa (IDM) (Studi Kasus: Desa Ponggok, Kecamatan Palohharjo, Kabupaten Klaten). Prosiding Seminar Edusainstech, FMIPA UNIMUS.
Nordiawan. (2008). Akuntansi Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Numan. (2015). Strategi Pembangunan Daerah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Pislawati Alfiaturrahman. (2016). Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa Di Desa Bagan Limau Kecamatan Ukui Kabupaten Pelalawan. Jurnal Valuta Vol. 2, No. 2.
Puspawjaya, Andrian, Julia Dwi Naritha. (2016). Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa.
Bogor: Pusdiklatwas BPKP.
Priyarsono. (2017). Membangun Dari Pinggiran: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Ilmu Ekonomi Regional. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning,Vol. 1, No. 1.
Sjafrizal. (2018). Analisis Ekonomi Regional Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia.
Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sumarto, S., M. Vothknecht, dan L. Wijaya. (2014). Explaining the RegionalHeterogeneity of Poverty: Evidence from Decentralized Indonesia. SMERU Working Paper. The SMERU Research Institute.
Suparmoko. (2002). Ekonomi Publik Untuk Keuangan Dan Pembangunan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi Press.
Suharto, Edi. (2010). Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat.
Bandung: Alfabeta
Todaro,MP&Smith, SC. (2011).”Ekonomi Pembangunan.Edisi ke-9 Jilid I, Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tulus. (2019). Pembangunan Ekonomi Perdesaan Berbasis Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif. Jawab Barat: Anggota IKAPI.
UNDP. (2015). Converging Development Agendas: Nawa Cita, RPJMN, andSDGs.
United Nations Development Programme Indonesia CountryOffice..
